Rented normally, it costs you £351 a month. That is £4,215 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £351 a month — the mortgage takes 92p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £64,850 less would close that shortfall — which is £64,850 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,219 mortgage

£1,324 rent in£351 short

◧ market rent £1,324 · 5 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£102,650 + refurb costs

And about £21,076 more over five years, because it loses £351 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£102,650 to buy it

~£79,454

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · feeswe haven’t been inside

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£85,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £351 a month. At £213,516 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £12,446 at that price.

offer £213,516

asked £300,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £166,000 in 2025

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 81% more than the £166,000 paid for it in 2025.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £140,477 of the £225,000 loan

That £84,523 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £62,046. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£2,039 needed

more than the £1,273 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,273PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Wolverhampton council approves 65% — 48% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate across 34 HMO decisions, not a forecast for this address.

65%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 34 decisions — as low as 48%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 592 sq ft

The advert and the survey disagree — open for both figures and the gap.

■ area measured on site

Is it a good location?Open the map

Wolverhampton, WV4 6SZ

1 of 5 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 16 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Rent by the room loses least, at £40 a month

Let it to the council: £1,248 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Rent by the room−£40 · £216,104 in

Standard rental−£351 · £182,104 in

Guaranteed council rent−£455 · £182,104 in

Housing-benefit rent−£739 · £182,104 in

Short-stay let−£1,209 · £182,104 in

6 nearby short-lets within 20 km · medium confidence

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 5 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£51,397 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 34% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £182,104 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed