Rented normally, it costs you £662 a month. That is £7,945 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £662 a month

It is £662 a month short. Borrowing £122,224 less would close that shortfall — which is £122,224 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£1,889 mortgage

£1,825 rent in£662 short

◧ market rent £1,825 · 1 comp2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£162,875 + refurb costs

And about £39,723 more over five years, because it loses £662 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£162,875 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£22,253, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£160,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £662 a month. At £302,023 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £20,202 at that price.

offer £302,023

asked £465,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £193,634 of the £348,750 loan

That £155,116 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £124,135. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£3,161 needed

more than the £1,755 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,755PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Lincoln council approves 86% — 78% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate across 117 HMO decisions, not a forecast for this address.

86%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 117 decisions — as low as 78%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 1,625 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

Lincoln, LN6 0UQ

2 of 5 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 17 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Rent by the room loses least, at £475 a month

Rent by the room needs £42,000 more cash than the others.

Rent by the room−£475 · £227,128 in

Standard rental−£662 · £185,128 in

Housing-benefit rent−£1,459 · £185,128 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£60,775 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 25% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £185,128 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed