Rented normally, it costs you £2,409 a month. That is £28,913 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £2,409 a month

It is £2,409 a month short. Borrowing £462,602 less would close that shortfall — which is £462,602 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

£3,516 mortgage

£1,677 rent in£2,409 short

◧ market rent £1,677 · 8 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.25% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.25% is the 5.50% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£322,400 + refurb costs

And about £144,563 more over five years, because it loses £2,409 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£322,400 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£29,394, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?

We cannot price this without a postcode

Which purchase tax applies — stamp duty, LBTT or land transaction tax — is decided by the nation the address sits in, and this listing carries no postcode to resolve it. Rather than assume England and then price to the pound off it, this card does not answer. The agent can give you the postcode.

□ no postcode on the listing

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £177,931 of the £675,000 loan

That £497,069 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £468,600. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£6,117 needed

more than the £1,613 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,613PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 2,200 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

Nearest stop up to 2 km away

Beyond a comfortable walk, and more than nine in ten listings we cover have one closer.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ mapped to a point, not an address■ nearest stop in our data□ kind of stop not recordedstraight-line distance, not the walk

What to know before you offerThe checks

Every tenancy here is periodic, with no Section 21 to end it

Tenancies are now periodic, with no Section 21 — budget a longer void.

1 problem found · 1 came back clear · 5 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from the Renters’ Rights Act 2025listing last seen 17 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Short-stay let loses least, at £614 a month

Your controls are set to Standard rental — £1,795 a month behind Short-stay let.

Short-stay let−£614 · £351,794 in

4 nearby short-lets within 20 km · low confidence

Rent by the room−£2,396 · £385,794 in

Standard rental−£2,409 · £351,794 in

Housing-benefit rent−£2,805 · £351,794 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with?The five-year sums

−£193,996 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 25% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £351,794 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed